Editor's Pick(1 - 4 of 8)
Digital Data Privacy and Security in State Government
By Michael Cockrill, CIO, State of Washington
Data is the currency of government. Vast amounts of data are being collected, stored and manipulated by every government agency. With the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) the amount of personal data being collected and shared is exploding. This creates issues for the government in both the way they manage data and around the public policy they enact.
On the public policy side, consider the very public competition between Apple and Google as they navigate the IoT. Apple appears to think that keeping users profiles private will increase stock price. Google appears to think anonymized user profiles are the product that they sell. What responsibility (if any) does government have in this competition? Should there be regulations that protect consumers? Should government simply let market forces prevail? All of these questions are informed by technologists within government in their roles as advisors to policy makers.
When everything a person interacts with is connected to the internet and collecting multiple, different pieces of data every second, of every minute, of every hour, of every day the data soon transforms from a lake, to an ocean with unimaginable depths, swift currents and rocky outcrops.
The lack of security focus on critical infrastructures endangers our entire economy, our national security, and the continuity of commerce.
But what is the right information government business leaders need to navigate this ocean? Most technologists immediately rush to the pieces surrounding the data; storage, transfer, interaction, visualization, analytics, etc. These are all important, but the harder pieces to tackle are data privacy and security.
Digital privacy is the next frontier in human rights. Policy, business owners, and ultimately citizens, must decide if they want their fridge to collect, store and use their data. From our health records, to our purchasing history, to our interactions with people and places, all this data makes up our digital persona. We must decide the balance between convenience and privacy as well as decide who owns this data. Who will control our digital persona? Once policy decisions have been made then securing the data to those standards becomes important.
Cyber security is the tax society must pay for use of the internet and especially the use of the IoT. The lack of security focus on critical infrastructures endangers our entire economy, our national security and the continuity of commerce. The technology strategies to keep our data safe will change overtime, but keeping the data safe from bad actors associated with organized crime, foreign governments and others will always be paramount.
States should invest in a three pronged strategy; technology that solves the business needs of the citizens and the state; data privacy policies that clearly articulate the potential problems and provides flexible solutions for the problems we know about now and the problems we have yet to discover; security infrastructure that includes policies, technologies and people. To develop this strategy government must collaborate with citizens as well as the private sector to bring them into the discussion and inform the conversation from a varied perspective.
When Government business leaders understand that data is the currency of government, digital privacy is the next frontier of human rights and cyber security is the tax society pays for use and convenience of the internet, government can start to address the complex issues that the IoT brings to our society.
Tug-of-War: Will Blockchain Bring Data Ownership Back to Users?
Nicole Nguyen, Head of APAC, Infinity Blockchain Ventures
GDPR:The Road Ahead
Raymond Goh, Head of Systems Engineering, Asia and Japan, Veeam Software
GDPR compliance challenges and solutions and how technology has benefited them
Sue MacLure, Head of Data, PSONA Agency
Exploring the opportunities and challenges presented by data protection for today's CIOs
Ian West, Director of Digital Information Services at Project One and member of the GDPR Institut's Advisory Committee